exceeding RH100%

All about WUFI 2D
Post Reply
shinya
WUFI User
WUFI User
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:21 pm -1100
Location: japan
Contact:

exceeding RH100%

Post by shinya »

In a result of my calculation, the RH exceeded 100%.
It was 100%~105%.

Is this calculation correct?
What does the part of over 100% mean?

Please give me some information.
shinya ogata
Thomas
WUFI Administrator
WUFI Administrator
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:33 pm -1100

Re: exceeding RH100%

Post by Thomas »

Hi shinya,

a relative humidity exceeding 100% means that the water content of the material exceeds free saturation.

Free saturation is the water content up to which a material can absorb liquid water to which it is exposed (rain, for example). Since during the absorption of liquid water air pockets will be trapped in the pores, free saturation is less than maximum saturation where the complete pore volume is filled.

Water contents between free and maximum saturation can be reached if condensation occurs (because condensation starts at the tiny ends of the pores and pushes all air out of the pores). While for humidities below 100% there is a unique mathematical relationship (the "moisture storage function") between relative humidity and moisture content, no unique relationship exists above 100%.

However, WUFI needs such a relationship in order to mathematically solve the moisture transport equations. Therefore WUFI artificially assigns relative humidities above 100% to the moisture contents between free saturation and maximum saturation. In all places where this occurs in your calculation you should also see a water content above free saturation.

These relative humidities above 100% have no real physical meaning and should be treated as being 100% (this is what you would measure in an experiment). WUFI only uses them for mathematical consistency in its equations. Maybe we should limit all relative humidities in the output of the program to 100% in order not to confuse the user...

Regards,
Thomas
Alberto Morales
WUFI User
WUFI User
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:57 pm -1100

Re: exceeding RH100%

Post by Alberto Morales »

hi Thomas,

is this still valid (see message above)?

Thanks
Thomas
WUFI Administrator
WUFI Administrator
Posts: 418
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:33 pm -1100

Re: exceeding RH100%

Post by Thomas »

Hi Alberto,

the internal handling of moisture contents exceeding free saturation is still the same. In the one-dimensional WUFI-Pro the relative humidities in the output data are automatically limited to 100 %. I'm not really sure right now about WUFI-2D. I think it's limited there now as well, but I'm not 101 % ( :D ) sure. Should you see humidities exceeding 100 % in the output, please treat them as 100 %.

Kind regards,
Thomas
Alberto Morales
WUFI User
WUFI User
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:57 pm -1100

Re: exceeding RH100%

Post by Alberto Morales »

Thanks
katinkar
WUFI User
WUFI User
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2024 8:51 pm -1100

Re: exceeding RH100%

Post by katinkar »

Hi,

Does this imply that one could evaluate an RH level<100% (water content above free saturation) as a possible sign of condensation happening?

Kind regards,
Katinka
Christian Bludau
WUFI SupportTeam IBP
WUFI SupportTeam IBP
Posts: 1157
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:08 pm -1100
Location: IBP Holzkirchen, the home of WUFI
Contact:

Re: exceeding RH100%

Post by Christian Bludau »

Hi Katinka,
Does this imply that one could evaluate an RH level<100% (water content above free saturation) as a possible sign of condensation happening?
At 100% RH all pores are filled with water, so that point out for dew water at a position. As smaller pores may be filled with water below 100% RH, it depends on the the size distribution of the pores, how many are filled up below 100%

Dew water is more a measure from the steady state calculations. From the transient view the water content is rising at one position depending on the moisture storage function of a material and over about 97% (depending on the material) there is liquid water in the pores or around the fibers which can be counted as a kind of dew water, but does not necessarily drip off.

Christian
Post Reply