Hi,
how a 250mm air layer should be calculated as nothing is in the WUFI library? which vapor resistance should be defined?
this layer is part of a suspended ceiling so not adjacent to vapor barrier layers
the plot below show data for different air layers from the library but for 250mm is negative. what is the science behind how to define the properties of air layers? should we consider that air layer with or without moisture capacity?
regards and thanks
Air layer 250mm unventilated
-
Alberto Morales
- WUFI User

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:57 pm -1100
Re: Air layer 250mm unventilated
Hi Alberto,
the science behind those numbers is this: Air at rest has a thermal conductivity of about 0.025 W/(mK) and a vapor diffusion resistance factor of µ=1 (by definition). However, the air in an air gap of a building component is usually not completely at rest. Temperature differences across the air layer will cause some convection in the air, and both heat and moisture transport are increased by this additional convective component. The values for thermal conductivity and diffusion resistance have been adapted to include this additional heat and moisture transport. There is also some radiative heat transport across the air layer which is included as well.
The data for the air layers in WUFI's material database have been taken from a table in a (then) standard text on building physics which unfortunately only represents air layers up to 150 mm. As you have seen yourself, extrapolating these data to larger thicknesses is not straightforward. There are formulas, based on similarity theory, which can be used to calculate these values for arbitrary air layer thicknesses. Standard EN 673 "Glass in Building" provides an example for such a set of formulas, and future versions of WUFI are planned to have these formulas implemented.
For example, for a horizontal 250 mm air layer with mean air temperature 23°C and mean temperature difference across the layer of 4 °C, the effective heat conductivity and diffusion resistance factor based on EN 673 are
for heat flow upwards (unstable layering): lambda_eff = 1.5 W/(m K), mu_eff = 0.078
for heat flow downwards (stable layering): lambda_eff = 1.2 W/(m K), mu_eff = 1.0
If in your case the heat flow can be expected to be predominantly upwards or downwards, you may choose the respective options. Otherwise, the next best option is probably to use a mean value.
As to the moisture storage function: We usually recommend using the air layers "without additional moisture capacity" as the hygric inertia of these layers is much more realistic. If there is the possibility of condensation on the surfaces of the air gap, a thin layer (1 mm) of the 'normal' air layers (with higher moisture capacity) should be included there which can take up the condensate. For your 250 mm layer this would mean
1 mm air layer
248 mm air layer "without additional moisture storage"
1 mm air layer
Important: ALL these layers should have the SAME lambda_eff and mu_eff as appropriate for a single layer of 250 mm, since they are an integral part of such a layer and the convection is that of a layer of 250 mm. Using the "1 mm" layers from the database would model very thin isolated air gaps with strongly suppressed convection.
For an example, see pages 13 and 14 of the respective Guideline.
Kind regards,
Thomas
the science behind those numbers is this: Air at rest has a thermal conductivity of about 0.025 W/(mK) and a vapor diffusion resistance factor of µ=1 (by definition). However, the air in an air gap of a building component is usually not completely at rest. Temperature differences across the air layer will cause some convection in the air, and both heat and moisture transport are increased by this additional convective component. The values for thermal conductivity and diffusion resistance have been adapted to include this additional heat and moisture transport. There is also some radiative heat transport across the air layer which is included as well.
The data for the air layers in WUFI's material database have been taken from a table in a (then) standard text on building physics which unfortunately only represents air layers up to 150 mm. As you have seen yourself, extrapolating these data to larger thicknesses is not straightforward. There are formulas, based on similarity theory, which can be used to calculate these values for arbitrary air layer thicknesses. Standard EN 673 "Glass in Building" provides an example for such a set of formulas, and future versions of WUFI are planned to have these formulas implemented.
For example, for a horizontal 250 mm air layer with mean air temperature 23°C and mean temperature difference across the layer of 4 °C, the effective heat conductivity and diffusion resistance factor based on EN 673 are
for heat flow upwards (unstable layering): lambda_eff = 1.5 W/(m K), mu_eff = 0.078
for heat flow downwards (stable layering): lambda_eff = 1.2 W/(m K), mu_eff = 1.0
If in your case the heat flow can be expected to be predominantly upwards or downwards, you may choose the respective options. Otherwise, the next best option is probably to use a mean value.
As to the moisture storage function: We usually recommend using the air layers "without additional moisture capacity" as the hygric inertia of these layers is much more realistic. If there is the possibility of condensation on the surfaces of the air gap, a thin layer (1 mm) of the 'normal' air layers (with higher moisture capacity) should be included there which can take up the condensate. For your 250 mm layer this would mean
1 mm air layer
248 mm air layer "without additional moisture storage"
1 mm air layer
Important: ALL these layers should have the SAME lambda_eff and mu_eff as appropriate for a single layer of 250 mm, since they are an integral part of such a layer and the convection is that of a layer of 250 mm. Using the "1 mm" layers from the database would model very thin isolated air gaps with strongly suppressed convection.
For an example, see pages 13 and 14 of the respective Guideline.
Kind regards,
Thomas
-
Alberto Morales
- WUFI User

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 10:57 pm -1100
Re: Air layer 250mm unventilated
Thanks again for you explanation.
However I did not understand the next "If in your case the heat flow can be expected to be predominantly upwards or downwards, you may choose the respective options. Otherwise, the next best option is probably to use a mean value.". Could you please put an example?
How would you model this layer which contains in the same planes Air, insulation and metal deck? Would you recommend to model in WUFI the insulation in the flutes of the metal deck as a continuos insulation layer? Should we ignore all gypframes support, galvanized metal deck, etc in a WUFI model? Which scenarios should we consider metal deck in the simulation?
However I did not understand the next "If in your case the heat flow can be expected to be predominantly upwards or downwards, you may choose the respective options. Otherwise, the next best option is probably to use a mean value.". Could you please put an example?
How would you model this layer which contains in the same planes Air, insulation and metal deck? Would you recommend to model in WUFI the insulation in the flutes of the metal deck as a continuos insulation layer? Should we ignore all gypframes support, galvanized metal deck, etc in a WUFI model? Which scenarios should we consider metal deck in the simulation?
-
Christian Bludau
- WUFI SupportTeam IBP

- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:08 pm -1100
- Location: IBP Holzkirchen, the home of WUFI
- Contact:
Re: Air layer 250mm unventilated
This is a common situation when modeling profiled metal decks with partially filled cavities.How would you model this layer which contains in the same planes Air, insulation and metal deck? Would you recommend to model in WUFI the insulation in the flutes of the metal deck as a continuos insulation layer? Should we ignore all gypframes support, galvanized metal deck, etc in a WUFI model? Which scenarios should we consider metal deck in the simulation?
In practice, we usually recommend simplifying the geometry into separate 1D sections:
- One section through the high flutes (air / less insulation)
- One section through the low flutes (insulation-filled areas)
Or, if necessary, we use WUFI 2D.
Christian
Re: Air layer 250mm unventilated
Hi Alberto,Alberto Morales wrote: Mon Jun 08, 2026 7:07 am -1100 However I did not understand the next "If in your case the heat flow can be expected to be predominantly upwards or downwards, you may choose the respective options. Otherwise, the next best option is probably to use a mean value.". Could you please put an example?
in the case of horizontal air layers it makes a difference whether the heat flow goes upwards or downwards. If it goes downwards, the top of the air layer is warmer than the bottom, the denser air at the bottom corresponds to a stable density layering within the air layer, and there is no thermal circulation in the layer. The thermal conductivity is simply that of a stagnant air layer, about 0.025 W/(mK).
If the heat goes upwards, the bottom of the air layer is warmer than the top, the denser air at the top tends to sink down, the density layering is unstable and we have some convective motion within the layer which contributes to the heat and vapor transport. In the example I gave, heat and vapor transport are increased by a factor 12.8 (according to the formulas of standard EN 673), and the effective heat and vapor transport coefficients change by that factor (the coefficients for heat transport also contain a factor accounting for radiative heat exchange).
The air layers currently implemented in WUFI do not distinguish between vertical or inclined or horizontal air layers, or between heat flow going up or down. But EN 673 does, and for horizontal air layers (which you have in your project) it provides one set of transport coefficients for the case "heat flow upwards" and a different set for the case "heat flow downwards".
Ideally, the appropriate set of coefficients should be chosen for each time step of the simulation, according to the current circumstances. But the present version of WUFI cannot do that. So how to proceed?
If in your simulation the heat flow across the air layer is predominantly upwards, you should use the coefficients for "upwards", and "downwards" if predominantly downwards. If you are not sure, evaluate a preliminary simulation to see in which direction the heat flow goes in your case.
You can also test both options to see whether they make a significant difference in the assessment (i.e. pass/fail) of your component. Most likely, the resulting temperatures and water contents will be slightly different, but the decisive pass/fail assessment will not be affected. If it is, you have a somewhat sensitive construction which requires some deeper thinking...
Regards,
Thomas
